On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Galileo Vidoni <galio2k@gmail.com> wrote:

I think we should keep both for the moment. Theo's text has more to do with a general definition of groups (that can be linked also with the roles matrix) than with new groups in particular, IMO.

Thanks Austin!

Best,
galio

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Jon Huggett <jon.huggett@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Austin

Great to see this. Is this page on 'New groups' meant to replace the page 'groups' [4] or should we keep both?

Cheers

Jon

[4] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/groups

Jon Huggett
+44-795-278-0688
+1-415-465-2700
jon@huggett.com
www.huggett.com
Skype jon.huggett

On Mar 5, 2011, at 10:56 , Austin Hair wrote:

Hi guys,

As agreed at yesterday's meeting[0], I moved the "new groups" text[1]
to meta yesterday, and this morning finished summarizing the questions
brought up in the previous thread[2]. Several people also made some
rather insightful comments in that thread, and I think they deserve
re-stating, but I'm not going to try to put words in people's
mouths—particularly words said on a private list.

Would everyone please take a look at [1] and add your thoughts?

Austin

[0] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Working_group_meeting_2011-3-4
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_groups
[2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_groups#Questions

_______________________________________________
Movementroles mailing list
Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles

_______________________________________________
Movementroles mailing list
Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles

_______________________________________________
Movementroles mailing list
Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles