Hi Lodewijk,

Everyone will be asked to review and provide feedback on the latest changes.  Starting with this list :-)  Many people have been working on Meta, including you and others on the chapter's council rec.

We will surely need to organize a wider review of the charter language, likely including a personal contact with a rep from every chapter and other current movement group.

I can't help but feel that as a working group, we failed because we have not been able to reach the level of involvement we were looking for. 

I do think that we need to continue to pursue involvement and participation, more aggressively and personally in the coming month than we have sinec Wikimania.  We are still looking for engaged review and constructive edits, but I think we are much closer to a clean set of recommendations that are easy to comment on.

If you or someone else is willing to work on a Signpost series with me, I'd like to cover each of the recommendations in some detail, as we intended during the first months of this year, in a weekly series.  By the end of which we should have much more engagement, and people thinking actively about how they will engage int he coming year's strategizing.

SJ