Hi, I think it was Joaquin, Sam, and Bryan with whom I discussed relative skins usage on some popular skins, in the context of which skins Reading is on the hook for in the sense of full maintenance or high priority fixes (even if only coordinating) when issues arise. Here's that data, based on some queries Timo ran recently (thanks, Timo!). * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=cologneblue: 7k users. * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=monobook: 193k users. * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01: 3.1m users. * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 6k users. * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 179k users. * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 2.3m users. * commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 1k users. * commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 59k users. * commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 687k users. -Adam _______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

"Active" here relates to the MediaWiki user_touched database field. This is set whenever the user logs in, as well as after various other actions that users can perform.

On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:47, Adam Baso &lt;abaso(a)wikimedia.org&gt; wrote: Timo, would you please clarify on the definition of "active"? On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Jon Robson &lt;jdlrobson(a)gmail.com <mailto:jdlrobson@gmail.com>> wrote: Can you clarify what "active" means? Does that mean users visiting the page on a daily basis or does it relate to editors or something else? I'm keen to understand if some of these accounts are dormant and unused or are frequently logged into. On 29 Jun 2015 11:16 am, "Adam Baso" &lt;abaso(a)wikimedia.org <mailto:abaso@wikimedia.org>> wrote: Hi, I think it was Joaquin, Sam, and Bryan with whom I discussed relative skins usage on some popular skins, in the context of which skins Reading is on the hook for in the sense of full maintenance or high priority fixes (even if only coordinating) when issues arise. Here's that data, based on some queries Timo ran recently (thanks, Timo!). * en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/>, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=cologneblue: 7k users. * en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/>, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=monobook: 193k users. * en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/>, users active since 2015-01-01: 3.1m users. * en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/>, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 6k users. * en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/>, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 179k users. * en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/>, users active since 2015-03-01: 2.3m users. * commons.wikimedia.org <http://commons.wikimedia.org/>, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 1k users. * commons.wikimedia.org <http://commons.wikimedia.org/>, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 59k users. * commons.wikimedia.org <http://commons.wikimedia.org/>, users active since 2015-03-01: 687k users. -Adam _______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l>

On 29 Jun 2015, at 22:19, Jon Robson &lt;jdlrobson(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Timo - so to clarify these are users who have logged in since 2015-01-01 ? It is possible to get a sense of whether they come back? e.g. What if someone registered on 2015-01-01, switched to Monobook and never came back - are they included? On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Timo Tijhof &lt;ttijhof(a)wikimedia.org&gt; wrote: -- Jon Robson * http://jonrobson.me.uk * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson * @rakugojon

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Adam Baso &lt;abaso(a)wikimedia.org&gt; wrote: Expect the ratio of users with obscure configuration settings to sharply rise when you look at groups with higher activity. E.g. a year ago, when I looked up various stats for the MediaViewer launch, non-Vector usage was 5% for users who edited Wikipedia in the last 30 days, and 15% for those who made at least 100 edits in the last 30 days. Non-Monobook usage also grows (over a percent for very active editors). _______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l