No. Explicitly not. This would just be folding our code out into a sub module. The point is to remove dependencies! :)

We dismantled it because code for templating when into core.

On 13 Apr 2015 12:41 pm, "Bahodir Mansurov" <bmansurov@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Essentially, does that mean we want to re-create Mantle? If so, we should consider the reasons why we dismantled it.

> On Apr 13, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Jon Robson <jrobson@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> I did a quick spike [1] to work out how Gather could stop depending on
> MobileFrontend.
>
> Essentially problems come into 2 categories:
>
> 1) Finding a place for Gather in the desktop skin and addressing
> styling issues in desktop skins (I am working on these and don't see
> any major blockers here).
> I think to fix this we simply need to provide Gather as a desktop beta feature.
> This is tracked here: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95227 and I
> see no issues with doing this.
>
> 2) frontend code standardisation
> The main problem with the hard dependency is that MobileFrontend uses
> a library that was built around the same time as OOJSUI. Migrating
> MobileFrontend to use OOJSUI is a big task and although has happened
> somewhat (the codebase now uses OOJS for class inheritance) it is by
> no means complete.
>
> Gather current depends on a variety of MobileFrontend modules which
> mainly include: API, overlay, user and user setting code, EventLogging
> schema code, notifications code. We also have a method
> mw.mobileFrontend.require and mw.mobileFrontend.define for defining
> modules. OOJS ui does this differently writing class names to the OO
> global variable object.
>
> ==The long term fix===
> ... is obviously to migrate all the code to OOJS UI which I believe
> would require the following steps:
> * https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88559 which as an end result will
> rewrite overlay code in oojs ui
> * Rewriting mw.util.notify as an oo js ui component and folding the
> mobile toast notification into it. -
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66565
> * Core should have a way to store user settings in localStorage rather
> than using $.cookie (similar to M.require( 'settings' ) ) - something
> akin to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T67008
> * EventLogging Schema.js should be ported to oojs ui and moved into core.
> * We only use user for the getEditCount function - it would be trivial
> to rewrite using mw.user
>
> == the short term fix==
> We could split out the frontend library MobileFrontend uses to allow
> us to share it between Gather and MobileFrontend.
>
> The way I see this working is to merge all the shared generic JS code
> into its own project just like oojs ui and slowly rewrite it there
> till it is pure oo js ui. This would take everything in the
> javascripts/common/ folder except application.js and bundle it into
> one file.
>
> We could include this as a submodule in both projects, both extensions
> conditionally adding a RL module for it when it does not exist.
>
> What do people think about taking this approach on the short term?
>
> [1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94100
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobile-l mailing list
> Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l