Indeed. The thing that I find curious is that 3 times as many edits were lost as were saved.Then again, it would be nice to know how many got their edits in on retry.On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Maryana Pinchuk <mpinchuk@wikimedia.org> wrote:On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfaker@wikimedia.org> wrote:There are fewer edits than there were edit conflicts.That makes perfect sense, since an edit conflict doesn't lead to a successful edit stored in the revision table :)Aaron, if you're interested in lining this up with attempted mobile edits, there's a schema tracking the mobile edit funnel (attempts, saves, errors) in log.> select count(*) from revision where rev_page = 40462095;+----------+| count(*) |+----------+| 1216 |+----------+1 row in set (0.05 sec)> select count(*) from revision where rev_page = 40462095 and rev_timestamp between '20131119023000' and '20131119030000';+----------+| count(*) |+----------+| 403 |+----------+1 row in set (0.12 sec)On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Steven Walling <swalling@wikimedia.org> wrote:
And the winner is... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midnight_Memories the new album by boy band One Direction.So basically, 1384 teenage girls all edit conflicted with each other. ;)_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
--