I am inclined to agree with Jon and make the change - especially
considering there has been radio silence about the change on this list, I
suspect it will be ok, unless there is a better forum to discuss these
kinds of changes (eg wikitech-l)?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Any further thoughts on this? Should I abandon the
patchset...? Does
anyone want to own this problem?
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think this is a pessimistic view of things. I
don't suspect this
would have a catastrophic change and we could always add a boolean in
LocalSettings.php in case we feel this will and need to roll back.
Realistically the fall out here is going to be a nuisance more than
anything and certain content will appear that didn't use to.
I personally think the best form of communication is to make the
change and then deal with the fallout. If something is rendering
strangely then people will notice and complain and we'll get that
fixed. This will happen in a much quicker time then spending time
exploring the impact and communicating and waiting for people to make
their changes with no incentive.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Max Semenik <maxsem.wiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> While I certainly agree in principle, do we
know how many pages are
> relying on this feature? Also, some communication would be good.
>
> On 14.01.2013, 22:21 Jon wrote:
>
>> I agree.
>> We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The
>> noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated
>> with the addition of nomobile
>
>> Thanks for pointing this out!
>
>>
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/43852
>
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B.
>> <Wikipedia.Danny.B(a)email.cz> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the
mobile
>>> version. Is that a bug or feature? If
it is feature, then I strongly
suggest
>>> to reconsider it and rather set up
new class "nomobile" instead. Some
stuff
>>> with noprint is useful on mobile, it
just does not have a sense to
*print*
> it.
>
--
Best regards,
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
--
Jon Robson
http://jonrobson.me.uk
@rakugojon
--
Jon Robson
http://jonrobson.me.uk
@rakugojon
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
--
Arthur Richards
Software Engineer, Mobile
[[User:Awjrichards]]
IRC: awjr
+1-415-839-6885 x6687