On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Dmitry Brant <dbrant@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi Jane,
>
> Perhaps my comments came off as more pessimistic than I intended. Of course
> I believe in the power of crowdsourcing, and I would never want to make
> anyone feel like their contributions are being marginalized.
>
> I'll agree for now that the idea of "fully" automated descriptions leans
> more towards science fiction than reality. :)
>
> However, my whole point has more to do with the apparent duplication of
> content that seems to be happening between the first sentence of Wikipedia
> articles and the corresponding Wikidata description. There's something
> about it that seems unnecessary. If we can figure out a way to
> automatically extract the description from the first sentence of the
> article, it would simplify things in two ways:
>
> 1) People wouldn't need to edit Wikidata descriptions, and would instead
> focus on improving the Wikipedia article.
> 2) People who monitor changes made to articles would need to monitor only
> the article, instead of the article plus its corresponding Wikidata
> description.
There are a lot more items on Wikidata than articles on Wikipedia. And
not every language has a Wikipedia article for each item. Don't just
look at descriptions on Wikidata as something useful for Wikipedia.
They're much more than that.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
10963 Berlin
www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l