It&#39;s totally up to you guys :) If it isn&#39;t helpful then you shouldn&#39;t have it. <div><br></div><div>I just wanted to chime in because as a user (or at least as a user who understands bugzilla which is a big caveat since many won&#39;t understand bugzilla... or possibly even a wiki page ) I like it as a place for both feature requests and bugs.I&#39;ve always found wiki pages get massively cluttered and having them on separate and trackable tickets makes it a lot easier to follow and understand.<div>

<br></div><div>James<br><div><br clear="all"><div><div>James Alexander</div>
<div>Manager, Merchandise<br></div><div>Wikimedia Foundation</div>
<div>(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur<br></div></div><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jon Robson <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:jdlrobson@gmail.com" target="_blank">jdlrobson@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class="im">&gt; If they aren&#39;t going to get fixed at all (especially if those apps aren&#39;t<br>
&gt; going to be developed as much etc) then WONTFIX obviously but bugzilla is<br>
&gt; specifically used for &#39;wishlist&#39; options as well as bugs (hence the feature<br>
&gt; request option).<br>
<br>
</div>I think this is totally wrong. My personal opinion is bugzilla should<br>
be used for bugs and bugs alone. As a developer I find wishlist items<br>
to be unhelpful and just add noise - a lot of the time the things<br>
being wished for are not necessarily useful. I&#39;d much rather we had a<br>
system to capture these - why can&#39;t we just have a wiki for this sort<br>
of thing?<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>