+ Maryana/OliverWe're pulling some data for the Metrics meeting this Thursday that you should be aware of. It's one of the first steps in unraveling how to define a pageview (or other engagement/reach metrics)Specifically-Toby
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Yuvi, Monte, Toby, ideas?-AdamOn Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Tomasz Finc <tfinc@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Adam, lets move this to a public list and engage Yuvi, Monte, and Toby
to answer your questions.
--tomasz
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> The article loads for iOS and Android apps will no[w] both be in the web logs.
> But I can't tell if the pageview counting code is still accurate; also,
> there are two action=mobileview hits per page load in the apps, so it seems
> like it may be inaccurate from my read of it.
>
> How can Analytics be engaged to straighten out the relevant section of code?
> I think the app release dates may have been pushed out a bit more, so it may
> not be an emergency, but I wanted to check on next steps.
>
> Here's the relevant code from my understanding:
>
> https://github.com/wikimedia/kraken/blob/master/kraken-generic/src/main/java/org/wikimedia/analytics/kraken/pageview/PageviewFilter.java#L113
>
> I don't think action=view and action=query qualify as pageviews anymore (at
> least without even further qualification), if they ever were. It's possible
> the pageview counting code in the link above is only an intermediate step in
> the qualification of hits, but until we dig into it, it's an unknown.
>
> I wonder if asking Analytics for action=view and action=query to be removed,
> and then to disqualify 1 of the 2 URL types for the apps would make sense.
> Or rather, asking them if it sounds okay and if we should then run it by the
> engineering mailing list for further refinement.
>
> -Adam