Good call, Gergo, and for calling out crap when you see it. I know I am to blame on a lot of these (including the above example). I think the language solution you described is pretty good.restating suggested rules for those who don't read prose:
- bugs-->explain bad state in present tense (and desired state in description if nec). "Users screen goes blank"
- enhancement-->explain desired state as imperative "Make it so users can.." or "Users should be able to..."
I think we could go a step further and call out bugs with the prefix "bug:" for more clarity.-JOn Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Jeff Hobson <jhobson@wikimedia.org> wrote:+1, also any bugs should have clear repro steps in description and wanted features should have a clear UX path/outlined steps.
Thanks,
Jeff Hobson
On Jun 8, 2015 1:33 PM, "Gergo Tisza" <gtisza@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi all,I would like to recommend a naming convention that clearly differentiates between existing and wanted behavior. This is something that has been confusing for me for a while - bugs and tasks are both in the indicative so I often have trouble deciding whether a ticket describes a situation that exists but should not or one that does not exist but should.Random example from current sprint board: "Anon users can access public view from main menu" with the associated description being "When anonymous and I click collections I am taken to the public view." Does this mean that anonymous users should not be able to access the public view but somehow they can, or is this the description of a wanted feature? I can figure it out by digging up context, of course, but that takes time; ideally, this should be clear from just the task title (which I might be seeing in a list or on a workboard).I think it would be clearer if the title of the task would always reflected the situation at the time of creating the task, and titles describing a wanted but not currently existing state were phrased as imperatives. So if anons can see the public view right now and that's a bug the title would say "anons can access public view"; if they cannot access it currently but that's a feature we want, the title would say "anons should be able to access public view" or "make anons able to access public view".Thoughts?
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l