Bugzilla is a horrible place for feature requests as most go in and if no one acts on them within their first month then they likely will never get gone. Bugs should be actionable. And that action has to come shortly after their filed. Otherwise you generate such a large queue that almost no one wants to work on them. 

--tomasz



On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson@gmail.com> wrote:
My preference for MobileFrontend would be to resolve them all as
INVALID. Most of these just weren't bugs - they were wish list items
and in my opinion don't belong in Bugzilla.

My preference for the Monuments app is to resolve them all as WONTFIX

I cannot comment on the app. Brion or Yuvi would be best to ask...

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Andre Klapper <aklapper@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=19920,28528,30827,32098,32254,32290,32292,32320,33444,34233,3432535040,35525,36029,36407,36712,36838,37716,37944


 
If they aren't going to get fixed at all (especially if those apps aren't going to be developed as much etc) then WONTFIX obviously but bugzilla is specifically used for 'wishlist' options as well as bugs (hence the feature request option). If they're possibly going to get done in the future changing them to a feature request and low priority seems best so that you have them in the system and people see that it's at least 'known' as a request and can vote it etc.

James


James Alexander
Manager, Merchandise
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur


_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l