On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson@gmail.com> wrote:
Our communities reaction seems to be to push back on
influxes of new edits which makes me feel we should be spending more
time on moderation tools - but so far I don't see any hint that this
will become a focus.

+1 
I'll add that traditional community tools help a small group of highly talented people deal with a massive flow of changes. For written, encyclopedia articles, that is probably warranted.   For images, we should consider harnessing our massive army of readers.  Many large websites (with non-volunteer moderators) offload the penultimate step of moderation to human readers, via flagging or "report abuse" features. We have an army of readers who would be interested in helping at a lower level-of-effort--are there any concerns with bringing them in?