For reference: on IRC we decided to do the next release with all the bug fixes, but without the references. Since gerrit is being a ROYAL PAIN about cherry-picking to branches, we're accomplishing this by temporarily disabling the references code on master and branching there.

-- brion

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dan Garry <dgarry@wikimedia.org> wrote:

We should definitely make it as small as possible. Our goal here is just to fix the bugs, nothing more. That way we're less likely to introduce additional bugs. We can get the features out later. :-)

Dan

On 1 August 2014 11:34, Brion Vibber <bvibber@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Yep, if we do a more conservative release I'll want to back port at least the back-button fixes and that crash workaround. :) I'm investigating saved pages now...

-- brion

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Tomasz Finc <tfinc@wikimedia.org> wrote:

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brion Vibber <bvibber@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Dan, Tomasz is recommending that for our next push we do a small bug fix
> iteration from the first release branch, rather than landing all the stuff
> we've worked on in the last couple weeks right away.

We're discussing this on IRC right now if you would like to join Dan.
No decision has been made. I want to make sure we have confidence in
what we push out and that we don't introduce new issues.

> Do we want to push both "small" and "large" updates to TestFlight or should
> we just send the "small" version?

--tomasz

--

Dan Garry

Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps

Wikimedia Foundation