Is this drop due to fewer people or fewer pages per user?
The answer here, is interesting and the impact is more significant than I would have expected. On Desktop the pageviews per visit (as internal referers/external+ unknown) is relatively constant. On Mobile web, however, the pageviews per visit is much lower and appears to be dropping. The following graphs explain:
Daily desktop pageviews, by referer 4/13--present (all wikipedias, all geos). There is strong correlation between pageviews that come from the outside v. the inside:
Daily Mobile web pageviews, by referer 4/13--present (all wikipedias, all geos).
Compared the 60% we have on desktop, you can see that the ratio is 40% (33% smaller) on mobile and that this gap has widened (though not in the last 2 years):
I don't know if we can explain all of our traffic decreases to the drop in session length, but it is certainly a big factor. Basically 60% of our pageviews (internal) shrink by 33% on mobile. So all else being equal, if we transfer all our traffic to mobile we lose 33% of our pageviews. Right now we're at 50%. This assumes that there is no change in numbers of sessions...on which we have no data right now.
Next Steps:
Unless I hear otherwise, I think the next steps are to start thinking through what the implications are.
- Do we try to identify reasons users might be skipping out earlier on mobile and fixing those?
- Do we try to make it easier for people to find content on mobile?
- Maybe sessions across the internet are just shorter on mobile and we should focus our efforts on helping people find us?
Regardless, I find this a bit comforting, because having the same number of users who spend less time would be much better than reaching fewer people: controlling the experience once they found us is relatively easier than altering the channels by which people find us in the first place.
Again questions/concerns/suggestions encouraged.
-J
mobile, which is a 15% drop in pageviews (again, assuming a 1:1 traffic switch).