And is that migration complete ?

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Max Semenik <msemenik@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> They will be gone with Solr (or its schema, ro be precise).
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Tomasz Finc <tfinc@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> So are their any technical limitations to experiment with both right now?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I'm saying there is use cases for both.
>> >
>> >  I would expect a site wide nearby feature to help me discover new
>> > places nearby that I should visit (Wikivoyage even has a 'Go next'
>> > section which does this)
>> >
>> > When I'm in a place, on the page itself I would like to be able to see
>> > map that helps me explore a city and find places to eat.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Max Semenik <msemenik@wikimedia.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >> I imagine that if someone's in London they're much more likely to be
>> >> interested in finding a place to see or to eat at rather than to find a
>> >> next
>> >> city for their trip. Unless all their touristic goals consist of
>> >> putting
>> >> check marks near city names in a looong list:)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not sure we'd want to bring in secondary points - I can imagine
>> >>> the real use of Special:Nearby on Wikivoyage is for travellers who are
>> >>> looking for places to go to next that are nearby e.g. by train/bus.
>> >>> Somewhere like London would report Cambridge, Stonehenge or Oxford as
>> >>> being nearby even though they are 60+ miles apart.. yet currently it
>> >>> only shows 8 districts in London.
>> >>>
>> >>> I imagine something like the in article Nearby pages  that we
>> >>> currently have in beta would be a better vehicle for secondary
>> >>> points...
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there anyway we can guide a volunteer developer to do this and is
>> >>> anyone interested? I'd love to see this moved along and give WV the
>> >>> nearby it deserves.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Max Semenik <msemenik@wikimedia.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson@gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Actually my question is about further tweaking this... please
>> >>> >> reread my
>> >>> >> email.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > D'oh!
>> >>> >
>> >>> > So the problem is not in radius but in what to display.
>> >>> > https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/mobile/cards/784
>> >>> > discusses how geo search can be made more useful for WV. Our present
>> >>> > Nearby
>> >>> > implementation that searches for primary coordinaes only is not
>> >>> > helpful
>> >>> > because the wiki consists of large pages with a lot of POIs around.
>> >>> > My
>> >>> > current work on porting to Elasticsearch would allow a sane spatial
>> >>> > search
>> >>> > for secondary coordinates, once it's complete we can experiment with
>> >>> > adding
>> >>> > a Wikiversity-specific mode for Nearby. With a lot of points around,
>> >>> > there
>> >>> > should be no need to have a continent-sized radius.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Jon Robson
>> >>> * http://jonrobson.me.uk
>> >>> * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson
>> >>> * @rakugojon
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jon Robson
>> > * http://jonrobson.me.uk
>> > * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson
>> > * @rakugojon
>
>