Is there any way we can flag these related bugs in the report itself, so when someone glances at the e-mail they know it might be due to a related bug and not a regression?I guess we could at least document the test itself in the code to link it to the bug...On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Chris McMahon <cmcmahon@wikimedia.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________sometimes Chrome never gets a starting URL. tracking this issue here: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60338On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jon Robson <jrobson@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Any ideas on why this one would fail - is this a timeout?On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:40 PM, <jenkins-no-reply@cloudbees.com> wrote:
FAILURE: MobileFrontend-en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org-linux-chrome Build #226 (Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:20:50 +0000)
Test Result
1 failed, 5 skippedFailed Tests
Test Name Duration Age Menus open correct page.Settings URL is set correctly 12 sec 1 All Tests
Package Duration Fail Skip Total (root) 13 min 1 5 51
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l