On 10 nov. 2015, at 19:20, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:Hi all. Apologies for the delay on this! We're pretty close now to having a complete table of Reading-associated extensions, meaning I think I can update the maintainers table to at least point to this content after I move the page. Would you please take a look at it now?TheDJ and brion, note you're mentioned in MwEmbedSupport and TimedMediaHandler. Is it fair to say you're the main people working on these two things today (in the future we should figure out how consumption-oriented stuff can be divvied up further, I think).
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez <jhernandez@wikimedia.org> wrote:+1 to being generic. For example if you look at Echo, the Collaboration team is on the maintainers.On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:Thanks! I added it to my subpage and assigned it to Reading Design. Assuming comments on this thread taper off soon, I'll figure out how to get this stuff added into https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers . I think in the Maintainers column we'll want to be generic and point to the particular team if someone isn't actively maintaining it, but otherwise point to a person who we know to be actively developing *plus* the particular team.-AdamOn Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Volker Eckl <veckl@wikimedia.org> wrote:There are currently plans on deploying skin Blueprint on mediawiki.org. Besides my work on UI Standardization I'll also continue to work on the skin. I think Blueprint should be on that list.Best,VolkerOn Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:Would you please share this on the list?
On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Volker Eckl <veckl@wikimedia.org> wrote:Hi Adam,there are currently plans on deploying skin Blueprint on mediawiki.org. Besides my work on UI Standardization I'll also continue to work on Blueprint. Although UI Standardization is a "special case", formally we belong to Reading and therefore I think Blueprint should be on that list.Best,VolkerOn Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:Hi all -I've been reviewing a list of extensions with Reading Engineering and Reading Infrastructure leads - props to James Forrester for promoting this discussion. Here's a list of extensions we believe currently falls under Reading for triage (n.b., not all extensions will get active development support).Presuming no major issues with this, I think we should move the page to mw:Reading/Extension_Responsibility.One important outstanding question:Is MultimediaViewer appropriate for Reading given its consumption-oriented nature? Or is this actually better suited to Editing (where there exists a team named Multimedia)?Some other notes:* For skins with low utilization, we in time probably should coordinate handover to interested community members (or discuss with community members practical approaches for EOL).* Regarding the Nostalgia skin, we believe it's only used on https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePage, so maintenance would be updating for breaking skin changes or security issues only.* JsonConfig, ZeroBanner, ZeroPortal - we'll need to examine this more closely. Yuri (who has deepest PHP knowledge on extensions) is now over in Discovery, Jeff (JS & Lua) is in Reading, and now I'm managing instead of writing lots of code.* Collection probably belongs in Services
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l