+1 please resolve them in a massive WONTFIX
On 12/13/2012 06:34 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:> Thanks for the answers (and some followup triaging), however as I've
> mostly seen "enhancements vs bug reports" discussions my original
> question still remains:
>
>> Do you prefer if I mass-reopen them and set priority to "Lowest", or
>> would you like to skim them in the next days to set
>> WONTFIX/FIXED/whatever?
If outsiders' opinions count, here goes a +1 for mass-WONTFIX and if someone feels a certain resolution in a certain report is wrong (and cares enough) they will reopen.
PS: I personally like to handle enhancement requests in bugzilla too, since the line between bug and feature is many time blurry. However, I disagree with the idea that in an open source any enhancement request is good and therefore must remain open. If the current development team seems that a request is pointless / utopia / a deviation from the current plans etc then it is ok to mark as WONTFIX. If someone feels like fighting then they can reopen, assign to themselves, show how wrong the maintainers were, fork, etc. Keeping unanswered open requests for years helps nobody.
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l