Sure; then you need to either ensure that gets maintained properly or devise a second on-demand cache-friendly bundler to do it at runtime.

Smartphones with real HTML and JS support at some point should receive a fully functional page, including site and user extensibility such as gadgets. To me it makes sense to go down the road of common infrastructure.

-- brion

On Nov 29, 2011 10:14 AM, "Hampton Catlin" <hcatlin@wikimedia.org> wrote:
You can always just append.

On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Tomasz Finc wrote:

We could but we wouldn't be able to use it on non jQuery compatible phones. Lots of BlackBerrys chocked really badly on jQuery.

What's the status on making ResourceLoader not jQuery dependent? I heard that it barely needs it yet bundles all of it.

--tomasz


On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Brion Vibber <bvibber@wikimedia.org> wrote:

We should make sure there are measurements along the lines of response & load times...

For the bundling; would it make sense to make use of ResourceLoader's bundling facilities?

-- brion

On Nov 29, 2011 9:40 AM, "Hampton Catlin" <hcatlin@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Ok, so since no one else is discussing this...
And maybe this is just my egomania gone crazy....

But... does the mobile site seem less responsive recently?
I'm finding it sluggish. :P

:P

Things I can see that might be causing it:

* The JS isn't bundled
* The JS isn't gzipped!
* The CSS is in two requests (bundle)

Any ideas? Am I just crazy?

-hampton.

_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l