On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:38 AM, James Alexander
<jalexander(a)wikimedia.org>wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure what to suggest.. IANAL either and no one else seems to
> be engaging in this conversation :-S
> Kenan / Juliusz (I think you follow this list) - might be worth you
> following up with legal and raising a bug if necessary? Or maybe Amir,
> you should raise a bug and we could get someone from legals' opinion/
>
[Was not previously a list subscriber; have done that now. Thanks to James
Alexander for bringing this to my attention.]
Kenan and I (along with other members of product and design) have been
looking at this language for a while to try to improve it. #1 on my list is
definitely to say "agree to irrevocably release" instead of "irrevocably
agree to release". :) The legal meaning is essentially the same but the new
wording would be clearer.
That said, we're thinking about rewriting a lot of the copyright language
stuff to make it more clear (and hopefully shorter to boot!) so it don't
think it is a high priority to rewrite/revise this - it may be completely
revised/reorganized in the next few months anyway.
Hope that helps-
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical
reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.*