Hi, 2009/6/10 Ekompute .info <ekompute(a)gmail.com>om>: There should be some middleground to have a skin that looks proper in both IE and FF. I know FF has more conformant support for CSS, but IE isn't that bad. Did you base your skin on monobook? There are provisions in that skin to deal with various IE peculiarities. I have created a new skin based on monobook (1.13, don't know if 1.14 or 1.15 have radically changed the way monobook is skinned) that works OK on both FF and IE. What are your requirements for the skin, and where does it break in IE? -- Regards, Jean-Marc -- .       ___ .  @@  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile" . (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN .   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control .   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

The new skin is now adopted at Webmasterteachyourself.com<http://webmasterteachyourself.com/Main_Page&g…ge>. I have displayed both the following files for the new skin in the website: * Nuskin.php <http://webmasterteachyourself.com/MediaWiki:Nuskin.php> * main.css <http://webmasterteachyourself.com/MediaWiki:Nuskin_main.css>All other files are unchanged. I suspect it is the use of em instead of px but I am not so sure. The skin looks good to me in Firefox 1024 x 768 but sure looks ugly... very very ugly with 800 x 600. Any workaround for that?

(P/S: Jean-Marc, can I have a look at your website?)

Hi Jean, thanks for your reply. You are right. I am thinking of the logo and the 4 Google ads. I tried to view your webpages but it requires registration and yet it doesn't allow registration. I see it is a pretty new site with no Alexa ranking. Are you selling yourself short? I wonder. As it is, it is hard enough to get traffic even without all the restrictions. PM Poon On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Jean-Marc van Leerdam < j.m.van.leerdam(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: