) are both very good wikis and they both have Wikiwig and are
free to download and install on your own servers.
I am sure there are others too.
Paul Y
(I work for Socialtext)
On 7/23/07, Umair Imam <umimam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And the only problem is that i have to be bound to a WYSIWYG based wiki.
Is there any other wiki which is as stable and simple as Media Wiki ?
I have been looking at xWiki, but it seems very complicated.
Any suggestions ?
--
regards
Umair
On 7/23/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> My Question is, If MediaWiki does not support any WYSIWYG editor, then
would
it be not hard for editors to post their material
using this Wiki ?
How does a lame user fnid his way around MediaWiki's Syntax ?
There has to be some other alternative.
While there have been lots of suggestions for WYSIWYG, it is very
difficult to implement with the current syntax (for technical reasons
I don't fully understand). The MediaWiki syntax isn't that difficult
to learn, however. You don't even need to use it at all, you can just
type in plain text. If you want simple formatting (headers, bold,
italic), it's quite easy. Things like tables and templates are much
more complicated, but there is no need to use them for most content.
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l