Hi folks,
I've included what I'm hoping is the final version of my patch for bug 4421 ("Image file extension should not be part of the name"): https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4421
Its a rather large patch, so I've included two versions of it: 1. Big hairy patch with everything in it 2. Broken up into smaller independent patches as best that I could in a tarball w/README
Any strong preference for one over the other (or a third option)? Also, if it's appropriate to request svn access and it's still a good time to check stuff in, I'm happy to start checking in the safer portions of this patch.
Rob
Rob Lanphier wrote:
Hi folks,
I've included what I'm hoping is the final version of my patch for bug 4421 ("Image file extension should not be part of the name"): https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4421
Its a rather large patch, so I've included two versions of it:
- Big hairy patch with everything in it
- Broken up into smaller independent patches as best that I could in
a tarball w/README
I think the best way to do it would be for you to get commit access and then to commit each of your small independent patches as separate svn revisions. As I said on the bug report, it should be committed to a branch, not to trunk.
I can give you commit access if you give me your preferred username and a link to your public key (preferably hosted on an HTTP server you control).
-- Tim Starling
Handy link to the wiki page: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Commit_access_requests
Added. Thanks for the link!
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:
Handy link to the wiki page: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Commit_access_requests
MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
mediawiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org