Chris,
That is indeed the main problem I forsee with it, as with any new community-oriented site.
Building up a community organically is hard and time-consuming. This is why I'm
promoting it in a respectful manner here and elsewhere. Around 10 years ago, there was a
successful forum with a very similar name which I helped moderate and assisted with quite
a bit, but it fell by the wayside and I was unable to get through to the former owner in
order to revive it. Given how far in the past it was, I felt that it's about time
someone tried to fill that niche again.
Thank you for your suggestions on what can be done in order to help increase the
likelihood it is used. If you or anyone else has further suggestions, I'd love to hear
them. Let me know what I can do in order to draw you to start using it, even for
non-Q&A purposes. Feel free to reply in private to avoid cluttering the list.
Regards,
Skizzerz
-----Original Message-----
From: MediaWiki-l [mailto:mediawiki-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of chris
tharp
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 6:18 PM
To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [MediaWiki-l] Announcing new MediaWiki forum
Hi Ryan,
Sounds like a great idea, but as it is won't it have a critical mass problem? Meaning
the other methods used right now, like this mailing list, are attached one way, or
another, to
mediawiki.org and therefore draw people in. Without a lot of conversations,
and questions answered, it won't show up on Google, and therefore newbies, and others,
won't go. But only by getting a lot of people to go will questions be answered.
My suggestions to get around the problem described above are: 1. Select a manageable list
of common problems and post the answers to the new forum, 2. See if
mediawiki.org would
add a link to your forum on every extension page (or at the top of every talk page) like
they do currently with Wikiapiary (under the check usage link).
Anyways I wish you good luck with the forum. I hope it succeeds, but fear it will not get
off the ground since it falls outside the needs of the software as advanced by the primary
driver of the software (Wikipedia). Maybe I'm too skeptical, but having watched the
evolution of mediaiwki for years now I've noticed a decidedly non-enterprise bent to
the development of the software (for example, the 2015 Mediawiki Stakes Holder's
survey, as I recall, found an overwhelming number of enterprise users wanted: 1. easily
installation, upgrade and extension management (fundamentally years later no change,
except for the use of composer for extension management, but at the cost of excluding all
small wiki creators who don't have command line access, or lack the knowledge), 2.
Visual editor (same as one -- and nothing about installing the visual editor is quick and
easy), 3. More skinning and UI options (this one area that has seen an improvement with
Foundation and Bootstrap options available) and 4, access control and management (this is
one area of backwards development: the most popular access control extension, Lockdown,
doesn't work with any Mediawiki pass 1.26). Additionally the very helpful, Extension
Matrix, stopped working in 2013, which means there has no easy method to find new
extensions for four years. So I hope I'm wrong to be skeptical and I hope your forum
thrives.
Sincerely,
Chris
On Nov 8, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Sam Wilson
<sam(a)samwilson.id.au> wrote:
Isn't this rather a replication of the trial Discourse forum at
https://discourse.wmflabs.org/ ? (Which, unfortunately, is offline for
an upgrade at the moment!)
But anyway, sounds like an interesting idea. :-)
What software is it using?
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, at 06:10 AM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
All,
Right now, all methods of getting support for and general discussion
about MediaWiki fall flat in many areas.
* This mailing list is good for long-form questions and answers,
but is difficult to search leading to multiple duplicate questions.
The nature of the list also makes things like embedding screenshots
difficult.
* [[Project:Support desk]] on
mediawiki.org is serviceable, but
long-form questions or answers require a large amount of scrolling
due to the narrow content width in Flow, and again attaching
screenshots to illustrate problems is difficult.
* The #mediawiki channel on IRC (and related channels) are not easy
for newbies to discover or use, and many organizations block IRC
meaning that we cut off this support method from those at such
organizations who have MediaWiki questions. Like the other support
methods, screenshots are also difficult.
As such, I have launched a new support forum for MediaWiki[1]. It
aims to make it easier to not only ask for and receive support
compared to the methods I outlined above, but also hopes to serve as
a hub where people who run their own MediaWiki installations can
connect, share tips, and network. To my knowledge, there is no such “MediaWiki Users
Group”
outside of mailing lists at this time. The service is ad-free and
content posted is available under CC-BY-SA 3.0 so that particularly
good answers can be used to bolster documentation on
mediawiki.org.
I encourage anyone that is interested to check it out, and please let
me know if you have any feedback, suggestions, or questions about it 😊.
Regards,
Skizzerz
[1]
https://mwusers.org
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l