Hi, do pages need to be enabled? I think the question of enabling does not
arise.
PM Poon
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Greg Webb <gregw(a)zip.com.au> wrote:
23/05/2009 21:06:58
Hi:
That's good to know. Do many MW admin/sysops allow the use of Common.js
through the settings switch $wgUseSiteJs? Some people seem to think that it
is 'dangerous'. I don't know the capabilities of JavaScript but my IT
experience would say that JavaScript cannot write to areas that it is not
permitted to write to. Hence I would conclude that any changes I made using
JavaScript on my sub-wiki would only be able to address my sub-wiki, not
the
top level one and not any other sub-wiki. That doesn't sound dangerous to
the users of other wikis. Is this argument flawed?
Why do I want access to Common.js? Very simple application, I want to set
my
own Favicon and not use the one set at the top level. :-)
___________
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: mediawiki-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:mediawiki-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of K. Peachey
Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 7:37 PM
To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Enabling the Common.js feature
All pages within the Mediawiki: namespace are automatically full protected
[hard so they can't be unprotected], so only users with sysop/admin rights
on the wiki would be able to edit it.
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l