Just use Flow.
LQT is severely buggy due to its reliance on wiki pages for message
storage. It resulted in a very deep hooking into the MediaWiki internals,
causing endless breakages.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Jason Ji <jason.y.ji(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
My team at the MITRE Corporation is considering using the LiquidThreads
(LQT) code base as a starting point for a new commenting extension we are
writing. We would either fork LQT and work directly on the existing code,
or at least use the code as inspiration or a basis for how to start
designing our own extension.
I'm aware that development of LQT was canceled over three years ago - can
anyone shed some light on the backstory of why it was abandoned? If there
were some fundamental technical flaws with the extension, that would be
good for us to know if we shouldn't waste our time; on the other hand, if
it was more of a policy/philosophy reason, then that would also be good for
us to know, to see if that reasoning applies to our needs.
Thanks!
--
Jason Ji
The MITRE Corporation
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
--
Best regards,
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])