On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jack D. Pondjack.pond@psitex.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AUM
I was unaware this topic had been addressed. Whether or not I agree with the discussion, I certainly do not want to reopen old wounds. Obviously the correct approach would be to write an extension.
Thanks for pointing me to the discussion Trevor.
Jack
You should note that AUM didn't come to consensus so isn't counted as really valid.