If you have database access you can look at job timestamp to get an idea
On Sunday, May 24, 2015, Huji Lee huji.huji@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, got it.
Is there anyway to get a sense of how fast/slow jobs are being executed on a wiki? For instance, on English Wikipedia, I can see how many jobs are in the query using the API, but can I get a sense of the average time it gets for a job to run?
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, John <phoenixoverride@gmail.com javascript:;> wrote:
Editing the template adds 1? Job to the queue that then updates
everything.
If needed you can run/schedule runjobs.php in the maintenance folder. I know smaller wikis sometimes have issues with the jobs not getting
executed
fast enough
On Sunday, May 24, 2015, Huji Lee <huji.huji@gmail.com javascript:;>
wrote:
Great answers.
Here is a follow up question though: I edited a template used in
thousands
of pages, yet the Job Queue for that wiki did NOT increase by a factor
of
thousand. It simply increased from around 10 to around 30. And since
then
(several days ago), the associated page links are not updated. I
understand
that Job Queue is not easy to comprehend, but can you shed a light as
to
why the job queue only grow that much, and why the links haven't been updated since? (Note that job queue very quickly shrank to 10 or so
again).
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM, John <phoenixoverride@gmail.com
javascript:;> wrote:
When editing a template the resulting link updates go thru the Job
Queue
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Job_queue which has a lot of variables which determine the speed that jobs get executed.
When you perform a null edit the page is reparsed, resulting in
updates
to
the link related tables (iwlink, external_links, page_links ect)
which
is
what the whatlinks here results. Normally the job queue forces a
reparse
as
needed.
a standard purge does not update the table, however a forcelinkupdate
added
to the purge URL will achieve the same thing see
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Parameters_to_index.php#Actions
As for job queue numbers, dont try and understand it, its a confusing
mess.
A single job might affect many pages, might or might not spawn more
jobs
and several other variable actions
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Huji Lee <huji.huji@gmail.com
javascript:;> wrote:
I have a number of related questions regarding MediaWiki's caching mechanism. I would be grateful if one could answer these please.
The
assumption here is that a wiki is configured using the exact same
caching
methods that Wikimedia uses.
Please feel free to provide links to https://www.mediawiki.org as
well
as
https://noc.wikimedia.org when specifying configuration variables
in
your
answers as I am sure this would benefit future readers of this
thread
as
well.
Q1: Page [[foo]] contains template {{bar}}. I edit that template,
but
the
page is not immediately updated. If I don't manually purge the
cache
of
that page, how long would it take for the page cache to be updated?
Which
variable sets that time? And what is the value of that variable
currently
at Wikimedia wikis?
Q2: Page [[foo]] contains template {{bar}}, and that template
provides
a
link to page [[norf]]. I edit the template such that it instead
links
to
page [[qux]]. However, when I go to Special:WhatLinksHere/norf I
still
see
[[foo]] listed. Even if I try ?action=purge on [[foo]], that
behavior
doesn't change. The only way to change it is either to edit [[foo]]
and
change its content, or to simply go to the edit page of [[foo]] and
save
without changes.
Q2.A: If I don't do that null edit, how long would it take for the
page
cache to be updated? Which variable sets that time? And what is the
value
of that variable currently at Wikimedia wikis?
Q2.B: Why is it that ?action=purge doesn't update the pagelinks
table?
Q2.C: Why is it that saving a page without any edits triggers any
update
mechanism? (I would assume it'd be less costly overall to say "if
diff
is
null, don't do anything at all"; this question is more
philosophical:
why
would we not like the quoted behavior?
Q2.D: Does the Special:WhatLinksHere results come from a cache? In
other
words, if I query the database directly right after I change the
template
(as mentioned in Q2) but before I do any null edits, would it still
show
the old page link from [[foo]] to [[norf]]? Or would it show the
correct
link from [[foo]] to [[qux]] while Special:WhatLinksHere is still
showing
the old link?
Q2.E: Is it possible to induce the same "resolution" through API?
That
is,
is it possible to try to save a page without any changes to its
content
via
API, and thereby forcefully update the page links entries for that
page?
Q3: Assume that 100 pages contain template {{bar}}, and that
template
provides a link to page [[norf]]. I edit the template such that it
instead
links to page [[qux]]. Would that add any jobs to the job queue? If
yes,
how many? Should I expect 100 new jobs to be added, because 100
page
cache's need updating?
Thanks in advance,
Huji _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l