By the way, you missed the real test case in your spell checker - you really
have to plan for the most complex case - an amalgamation of wikimarkup,
html, and css:
{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4"
style="border: 1px;
border-color: #666; border-style: solid;"
|- bgcolor="#0BA8A8"
| width="22%" |<div align="center">'''<font
color="#FFFFFF">Who</font>'''</div>
| width="70px"|<div align="center">'''<font
color="#FFFFFF">Image</font>'''</div>
| width="20%" |<div align="center">'''<font
color="#FFFFFF">When</font>'''</div>
| width="58%" |<div align="center">'''<font
color="#FFFFFF">What</font>'''</div>
On 7/20/05, Brian <reflection(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You have to realize that many folks are using multiple operating systems.
On a given day I am on XP, FC4, and OSX. While I applaud a mac tool, the
real fault is in writing tools that don't work natively on all operating
systems. That's where a server-side app comes in handy.
On 7/20/05, Jan Steinman <Jan(a)bytesmiths.com > wrote:
From: Brian <reflection(a)gmail.com >
There is an additional problem with client-side spell chekers. If
you use
spellbound on an article that has html or css in it, it will
attempt to
check all of the attributes which becomes very annoying...
The speller built into MacOS X seems to be smarter than that. Example
at:
http://www.bytesmiths.com/stuff/SpellExample.gif
But this is pretty far off-topic, and some defensive people probably
view it as flame bait. It is not intended as such. I'll be quiet now.
:::: You can't have your SUV and eat it, too!
:::: (It takes TEN calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce EACH
calorie of food.)
:::: Jan Steinman <
http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Van>
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l