On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:35 AM Jeroen De Dauw <jeroendedauw(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
This makes it sound like the MediaWiki codebase is
pretty well designed.
That is in stark contrast to my view, which is that it is a typical big
ball of mud with serious pervasive issues too numerous to list. So I'm
curious how you arrived at your view.
As opposed to Wikibase, which is a collection of well-designed components
which nobody (outside of its development team) knows how they are held
together to form a cohesive product. My guess has always been magic and/or
prayers.
Something something glass houses & stones.
-Chad