Hi,
I have found that assigning groups with APCOND_EMAILCONFIRMED using $wgAutopromote gives the rights of the group named within $wgAutopromote, but the users are not actually recorded as being members of the group.
Let me explain, it looks like the promotion works, but the user IS NOT really belonging to that group, so the rights i've set don't work, because MediaWiki doesn't recognize that the user belongs to the promoting group.
I mean that the user can see himself belonging to the promoting group in his/her user preferences, but in the Special:UserRights page (logged in as WikiSysop) the promoting Group is not checked for him/her in parenthesis and actually the user doesn't inerhit the rights of that group.
Am I miss something in configuring Mediawiki?
How can I make MediaWiki recognizes that the user belongs to a promoting group after he/she is autopromoted?
Kind regards,
Valerio Pelliccioni
We are getting a thumbnailer error on a png file of 16 Mpx. This error
is: "Error creating thumbnail: Invalid thumbnail parameters". It appears
there is an upper bound limitation somewhere, since Wikipedia has a
similar problem (e.g., see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Category:Old_Ordnance_Survey_map_images).
Is this a hard limit due to limitations of Imagemagick or is there a
global that controls the upper bound on image size that the thumbnailer
can handle?
--
-- Dan Nessett
Hi Dear, how to make a table of contents in four columns? Thanks for any
help. Nevio
--
{+}Nevinho
Venha para o Movimento Colaborativo http://sextapoetica.com.br !!
Due to numerous requests we have extended the submission deadline for
Wikimania 2010 as follows:
* Abstract Registration: May 24, 11.59 p.m. (Pacific Time)
* Notification for workshops: May 29, 11.59 p.m. (Pacific Time)
* Notification for panels, tutorials, presentations: June 3, 11.59
p.m. (Pacific Time)
See the Call for Participation for more details:
http://wikimania2010.wikimedia.org/wiki/CFP
Thank you for helping make Wikimania 2010 a successful event. :-)
See you in Gdansk, July 9-11!
With best regards,
Wikimania Team
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
To everybody that are with questions about MediaWiki auth with LDAP
ActiveDirectory:
http://conteudoopensource.blogspot.com/2010/05/mediawiki-autenticando-acess…
att,
Leonardo Couto Conrado.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Leonardo Conrado" <leonardocoutoc(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:08 AM
To: <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: MediaWiki-l Digest, Vol 79, Issue 31
> Hi peoples,
>
> I am using the mediaWiki version 1.11.0 and extension LDAPAuthentication
> 1.10.x(Because the version 1.11.x of extension LDAPAuth. dont downloading
> in the site .mediawiki.org, ), well, i got put auth to work in the mode
> that a single user LDAP authenticate through of my AD, i need now to put a
> group of the AD to authenticate in mediaWiki... Someone have a help about
> this issue?
>
> att,
>
> Leonardo Couto.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: <mediawiki-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:09 AM
> To: <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: MediaWiki-l Digest, Vol 79, Issue 31
>
>> Send MediaWiki-l mailing list submissions to
>> mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> mediawiki-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> mediawiki-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of MediaWiki-l digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Profiling information - how many percent make 100?
>> (Sam.Sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com)
>> 2. Re: Profiling information - how many percent make 100?
>> (Thomas Dalton)
>> 3. Re: Profiling information - how many percent make 100?
>> (Sam.Sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com)
>> 4. Wiki dropping database connection (Edward Swing)
>> 5. Re: Wiki dropping database connection (Huib Laurens)
>> 6. Re: Wiki dropping database connection (Edward Swing)
>> 7. Re: Profiling information - how many percent make 100?
>> (Tim Starling)
>> 8. Re: grabbing Article TOCs (Platonides)
>> 9. Re: Code to add new group named Engineering (Vineeth Venugopal)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:51:27 +0100
>> From: <Sam.Sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com>
>> Subject: [Mediawiki-l] Profiling information - how many percent make
>> 100?
>> To: mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Message-ID:
>> <515D160C16AE3C439D9B3F072EBEEE3209EA884F(a)LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Hi - I've just implemented profiling on 1.13.0 to see where the time
>> goes and I'm just a little confused:
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's a clip of what profileinfo.php shows me:
>>
>>
>>
>> -total 100%
>>
>> MediaWiki::initialize [+] 62.14%
>>
>> Parser::parse [+] 60.5%
>>
>> MediaWiki::performAction 60.35%
>>
>> Article::view 58.87%
>>
>> Parser::internalParse 46.76%
>>
>> Parser::replaceVariables 30.62%
>>
>> Parser::braceSubstitution [+] 18.86%
>>
>> MediaWiki::finalCleanup 16.74%
>>
>> OutputPage::output 16.05%
>>
>> Output-skin 15.96%
>>
>> SkinTemplate::outputPage [+] 15.95%
>>
>> AutoLoader::autoload 15.71%
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, perhaps I'm out of touch and this is a quantum mechanics matter
>> that's beyond me, but in the olden days, there were only 100 percentage
>> points - but the first two entries alone claim to be taking >120% of
>> the time - so I'd be grateful if this could be explained to me, please!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> /Sam
>>
>>
>>
>> Sam Sexton
>> Provisioning Team Leader
>>
>> Thomson Reuters
>>
>> sam.sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com
>> thomsonreuters.com
>>
>>
>>
>> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
>> information company.
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
>> Thomson Reuters.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:00:34 +0100
>> From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Profiling information - how many percent
>> make 100?
>> To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
>> <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <p2ha4359dff1004200600r454b219eu2cb37e92ac6a3333(a)mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> I don't know much about profiling, but I would guess that when one
>> method calls another the time spent in the 2nd method is credited to
>> both methods. That double counting gives totals of more than 100%.
>>
>> On 20 April 2010 13:51, <Sam.Sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com> wrote:
>>> Hi - I've just implemented profiling on 1.13.0 to see where the time
>>> goes and I'm just a little confused:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's a clip of what profileinfo.php shows me:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -total ? ? 100%
>>>
>>> MediaWiki::initialize [+] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?62.14%
>>>
>>> Parser::parse [+] ? ? ? ? ? ? ?60.5%
>>>
>>> MediaWiki::performAction ? ? ? ? ?60.35%
>>>
>>> Article::view ? ? ? 58.87%
>>>
>>> Parser::internalParse ? ? 46.76%
>>>
>>> Parser::replaceVariables ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 30.62%
>>>
>>> Parser::braceSubstitution [+] ? ? 18.86%
>>>
>>> MediaWiki::finalCleanup ? ? ? ? ? ? ?16.74%
>>>
>>> OutputPage::output ? ? ? 16.05%
>>>
>>> Output-skin ? ? ? ?15.96%
>>>
>>> SkinTemplate::outputPage [+] ? 15.95%
>>>
>>> AutoLoader::autoload ? 15.71%
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, perhaps I'm out of touch and this is a quantum mechanics matter
>>> that's beyond me, but in the olden days, there were only 100 percentage
>>> points - but ?the first two entries alone claim to be taking >120% of
>>> the time - so I'd be grateful if this could be explained to me, please!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /Sam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam Sexton
>>> Provisioning Team Leader
>>>
>>> Thomson Reuters
>>>
>>> sam.sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com
>>> thomsonreuters.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
>>> information company.
>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>>> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
>>> Thomson Reuters.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MediaWiki-l mailing list
>>> MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:03:38 +0100
>> From: <Sam.Sexton(a)thomsonreuters.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Profiling information - how many percent
>> make 100?
>> To: mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Message-ID:
>> <515D160C16AE3C439D9B3F072EBEEE3209EA8860(a)LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> I said:
>>
>>> Hi - I've just implemented profiling on 1.13.0 to see where the time
>> goes and I'm just a little confused:
>>>
>>> Here's a clip of what profileinfo.php shows me:
>>>
>>> -total 100%
>>>
>>> MediaWiki::initialize [+] 62.14%
>>>
>>> Parser::parse [+] 60.5%
>>>
>>> MediaWiki::performAction 60.35%
>>>
>>> Article::view 58.87%
>>>
>>> Parser::internalParse 46.76%
>>>
>>> Parser::replaceVariables 30.62%
>>>
>>> Parser::braceSubstitution [+] 18.86%
>>>
>>> MediaWiki::finalCleanup 16.74%
>>>
>>> OutputPage::output 16.05%
>>>
>>> Output-skin 15.96%
>>>
>>> SkinTemplate::outputPage [+] 15.95%
>>>
>>> AutoLoader::autoload 15.71%
>>>
>>> Now, perhaps I'm out of touch and this is a quantum mechanics matter
>> that's beyond me, but in the olden days, there were only 100 percentage
>> points - but the first two entries alone claim to be taking >120% of
>> the time - so I'd be grateful if this could be explained to me, please!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> /Sam
>>
>> ============
>>
>> What would also help is a sample of what a well-performing system would
>> show - this stuff ain't intuitive - to me, at least!
>>
>> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
>> information company.
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
>> Thomson Reuters.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:55:30 -0400
>> From: "Edward Swing" <deswing(a)vsticorp.com>
>> Subject: [Mediawiki-l] Wiki dropping database connection
>> To: <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <C505792E7472474DAC90E6C2844BBD96408C4F(a)destroyer.VSTI.LOCAL>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> I am relatively new to administering a wiki. I seem to be having a
>> problem where the wiki is dropping the connection to the database. Every
>> morning, when I try to access a wiki page (even the main page), it starts
>> loading (and I see the wiki name appear in the browser title), but the
>> content never loads. I am using MySQL on a Linux box (Fedora). Both the
>> httpd and mysqld processes are configured to start up automatically (and
>> the mysqld process should start up first).
>>
>>
>>
>> Any help or suggestions about where I should start looking? Many thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Edward Swing
>> Principal Technology Consultant
>> Vision Systems & Technology, Inc.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> 6021 University Boulevard, Suite 360 ? Ellicott City ? Maryland ? 21043
>>
>> Tel: 410.418.9919 ? Main: 410.418.5555 ? Fax: 410.418.8580
>>
>> Email: deswing(a)vsticorp.com
>> Web: http://www.vsticorp.com/ <http://www.vsticorp.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:07:22 +0200
>> From: Huib Laurens <sterkebak(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Wiki dropping database connection
>> To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
>> <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <l2g941943551004200807s936ceb90vc891e88c6bf25611(a)mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think this is more a mysqld error than a mediawiki error, but do you
>> have some info that could help?
>> *mediawiki version
>> *mysql version
>>
>> Does the log say anything more about why it stops? I had a problem
>> like this also a while ago. In my case the mysqld was using to much
>> RAM every night and that killed the mysqld.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Huib "Abigor" Laurens
>>
>> Tech team
>> www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:57:01 -0400
>> From: "Edward Swing" <deswing(a)vsticorp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Wiki dropping database connection
>> To: "MediaWiki announcements and site admin list"
>> <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <C505792E7472474DAC90E6C2844BBD96408C5C(a)destroyer.VSTI.LOCAL>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> It looks like I'm running MySQL 5.1.42 (should I upgrade?), MediaWiki
>> 1.14
>>
>> The mysqld logs do not show any errors (or other significant messages).
>> It does seem to die overnight, so your memory issue might be the cause.
>> Time to look in the MySQL manuals.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mediawiki-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> [mailto:mediawiki-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Huib
>> Laurens
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:07 AM
>> To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Wiki dropping database connection
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think this is more a mysqld error than a mediawiki error, but do you
>> have some info that could help?
>> *mediawiki version
>> *mysql version
>>
>> Does the log say anything more about why it stops? I had a problem
>> like this also a while ago. In my case the mysqld was using to much
>> RAM every night and that killed the mysqld.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Huib "Abigor" Laurens
>>
>> Tech team
>> www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MediaWiki-l mailing list
>> MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:20:26 +0200
>> From: Tim Starling <tstarling(a)wikimedia.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Profiling information - how many percent
>> make 100?
>> To: mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Message-ID: <hqknoq$8d1$1(a)dough.gmane.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> I don't know much about profiling, but I would guess that when one
>>> method calls another the time spent in the 2nd method is credited to
>>> both methods. That double counting gives totals of more than 100%.
>>
>> Also recursive functions are counted multiple times towards the total,
>> so they're wrong by a factor proportional to the stack depth. This can
>> give figures of over 100% for Parser::braceSubstitution() alone.
>>
>> -- Tim Starling
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:17:07 +0200
>> From: Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] grabbing Article TOCs
>> To: mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Message-ID: <hql5j8$594$1(a)dough.gmane.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> James W. Fishwick wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a way to put duplicate TOCs in a article? Or grab one page's
>>> TOC
>>> from another? Or use a template or extension to create a de facto TOC?
>>>
>>> I have a request for a wikibook I'm putting together to have a
>>> fixed-position sidebar that has a expandable, up-to- date TOC always
>>> there.
>>> Ideally, I could use a template using [
>>> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CustomNavBlocks CustomNavBlocks]
>>> that would either allow me to move the per article TOC into that
>>> position or
>>> duplicate it there.
>>>
>>> I am also interested in being able to sew together a global dynamic TOC
>>> from
>>> all the article TOCs in the Main Page of the "book."
>>>
>>> Thanks for any help you can provide.
>>
>> You can change the place when the TOC shows by placing __TOC__ there.
>> But you will have the toc only once. Not sure how would that interact
>> with the sidebar. Maybe you can place __TOC__ into the article with
>> absolute position at the location where the sidebar goes?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 9
>> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:39:07 +0530
>> From: Vineeth Venugopal <vinimes(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Code to add new group named Engineering
>> To: MediaWiki announcements and site admin list
>> <mediawiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <u2p2632ad1e1004202209p6d4b9c58i27f423f1fbf80171(a)mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Huib,
>>
>> Thanks for the Update.
>>
>> So I'm going to add the following lines to my LocalSettings.php file
>>
>>
>> $wgGroupPermissions['engineering']['read'] = true;
>>
>> $wgGroupPermissions['engineering']['edit'] = true;
>>
>> One final question:-
>>
>> Instead of copying all rights is there any way to use a common code like
>> using * (I'm not sure) ?
>> If I add the above code to my LocalSettings.php file will the group
>> engineering be added to the default groups mentioned in the attached
>> image?
>>
>> Thanks for all your support.
>>
>> ~Vineeth
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Huib Laurens <sterkebak(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When you look on that page you will see all the "defaultrights" when
>>> you want a new group with all the rights sysops have you can copy all
>>> the rights for sysops from that page and paste them in your
>>> localsettings.php when you change the sysop in the name of the group
>>> you want it will be created that way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/4/19, Vineeth Venugopal <vinimes(a)gmail.com>:
>>> > Huib,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the Update.
>>> >
>>> > So if I add
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > $wgGroupPermissions['engineering']['delete'] = true; to
>>> > LocalSettings.php
>>> > file
>>> >
>>> > Will it add a new group named engineering.
>>> >
>>> > But I guess it'll not have all the permissions of group Bureaucrats.
>>> >
>>> > Any idea on How it can be implemented ???
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > ~Vineeth
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Huib Laurens <sterkebak(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> I think this will help you on your way:
>>> >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Userrights
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Huib "Abigor" Laurens
>>> >>
>>> >> Tech team
>>> >> www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> MediaWiki-l mailing list
>>> >> MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > MediaWiki-l mailing list
>>> > MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Huib "Abigor" Laurens
>>>
>>> Tech team
>>> www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MediaWiki-l mailing list
>>> MediaWiki-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>>>
>>
Thanx for quick reply and sorry for my bad English, but I want something else.
I'm looking for a way to analyse database to determine the exact
quantity of the articles in every day of my-wiki's lifetime.
Hi, everyone!
Is there any extension (which I obviously missed on mediawiki.org) or any
other way to create a list of article count in dynamic on our small wiki
(e.g. 01/01/2010 - 10; 02/01/2010 - 50; 03/01/2010 - 100; 04/01/2010 - 200).
We have about 1100 articles at this time and have potential growth in about
15-20 times.
If it makes any sense we use:
MediaWiki - 1.15.0
PHP - 5.2.10 (apache2handler)
MySQL - 5.0.45-log
Thanks for any help.
I'm using Mediawiki for a online textbook of sorts, with a page representing
a chapter. I have returned on section numbering for all users to mimic the
way the chapters are numbered in the book; works great. However, it doesn't
make sense in my context to have the numbering start with "1" for each
chapter. Ideally there would be a way to start the numbering at any number.
Or at least be able to change the leading "1" - no chapter is structured
with multiple h2s. I've kludged a fix with javascript, but it is too slow
for my liking.
Are there plug-ins available with this functionality? How hard would it to
be to add a magic word that performs this functionality? Where in the php
should I start messing around?
--
James Fishwick
fishwick(a)gmail.com
434.284.3727
http://jamesfishwick.comhttp://www.aratherlovelything.com