What I dont understand is this:<br>if the license is not good enough for osm, why is it not good enough for wikipedia?<br>If the license is broken, why dont the authors of the license fix it so all projects benefit.<br><br>

it is all confusing for me.<br>mike<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Samuel Klein <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="http://meta.sj">meta.sj</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com">gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Kai Krueger &lt;<a href="mailto:kakrueger@gmail.com">kakrueger@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>


<br>
&gt; Sorry for all the questions, but I was curious to hear how people see<br>
&gt; the current status and its future. If there are any wiki pages, talks or<br>
&gt; other material about the current status of the OSM wikipedia integration<br>
&gt; I&#39;d be thankful for any further links as well.<br>
<br>
</div>I&#39;m curious too.  Has there been any discussion of how the change in<br>
OSM license will affect integration?  Are there any Wikipedia ---&gt; OSM<br>
information-sharing scripts that may break as a result?<br>
<br>
SJ<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Maps-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Maps-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Maps-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>James Michael DuPont<br>Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania <a href="http://flossk.org">flossk.org</a> <a href="http://flossal.org">flossal.org</a><br>