Guillaume and Federico, thanks! I might have been too generic :) Basically I would like to get a general feel for

* are we enabling new content-oriented (no impact until editors add it to the pages) features too fast or too slow? And that mostly means maps - should we make maps absolutely perfect before giving it into the hands of the community?

* should we enable new features earlier, in a more unfinished state, so that community can comment on things earlier, and possibly tell us if we are going in the wrong direction?  Or should we release them later, so new features are more polished from the start, but possibly less needed (miss the mark) and would require considerable resources to rework?

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM Guillaume Allegre <allegre.guillaume@free.fr> wrote:
Le 2016-11-05, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
> TLDR: How fast should new content (maps) features be rolled out, and how
> ready should they be? Constant but smaller improvements seems better.

Hello Yuri,

(please note I read the whole text, but...)
your discussion of the question is interesting, but it sounds a little
too theoretical to me.
Could you be more precise and give actual instances of the map features
you have in mind ?


--
° /\   Guillaume Allègre            OpenStreetMap France  http://www.openstreetmap.fr
 /~~\/\  Allegre.Guillaume@free.fr  Wikipédia Wiktionnaire Wikimédia-Commons Wikidata
/   /~~\   tél. 04.76.63.26.99      Des contenus partagés libres et collaboratifs


_______________________________________________
Maps-l mailing list
Maps-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l