As a science librarian who began work in the days before electronic
journals, these branch collections were at that time essential to any
research library. Their effectiveness was reduced because library
administration tried to avoid staffing them, but in the even earlier days
before photocopiers, which I have heard of but do not personally remember,
even unstaffed collections were of enormous importance. In their absence,
faculty make private collections for their own research group from their
research funds, which, in addition to being inequitable, is even less
cost-effective than branch libraries supported from the overhead on the
grants.
Even now, until the time when all material is digitized, they are an
enormous convenience. The best library service can compensate for this by
technical means, such as immediate scanning and transmission from the
storage facility. Such effective service, even if only on a M-F 9-5 basis,
is quite expensive, and it is commonplace to find original promisers of
access successively diminished. Once there are no material facilities it
is very easy to lower the quality of virtual ones to nonexistence. Not
just in libraries: whatever promises of increased overall service
administrations anywhere in any field of activity can promise from
cutbacks are notoriously unreliable.
If the money saved were used to improve alternate means of communication,
such as by funding open access, the balance would be very favorable, but
there is of course no direct linkage, and such a system change is beyond
any single institution or country.
David Goodman DGG
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada, 05/01/2014 22:37:
As usual, reports of their death were greatly exaggerated.
<<The Department's 11 library locations will be consolidated into 4
locations [...] The Department may remove only content that is duplicated
at one or more libraries and, in rare instances, materials which fall
outside the subject disciplines pertinent to the department's mandate from
its collection>>
http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/libraries-bibliotheques/FAQ-eng.htm
Those might be lies, but they say they're not really reducing their
collections. As sad as it is, using taxpayers' money to store duplicate
items in expensive locations is no longer possible. I only wish we had
dismantled more of the practically inaccessible 100+ libraries of my
university when I was in the board... the resistence, believe me, comes
usually from very short-sighted professors who only care about formal
"libraries" which are actually only a set of shelves in their own offices
that nobody but them and their close friends can and do use.
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
--
David Goodman
DGG at the enWP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG