Thanks
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:00 PM, <libraries-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Send Libraries mailing list submissions to
libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
libraries-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
libraries-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Libraries digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Structured Data on Commons] feedback request: what
(GLAM) metadata should be stored where? (Sandra Fauconnier)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:30:35 +0100
From: Sandra Fauconnier <sfauconnier(a)wikimedia.org>
To: cultural-partners(a)wikimedia.ch, glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
glam-us(a)lists.wikimedia.org, Wikimedia & Libraries
<libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [libraries] [Structured Data on Commons] feedback
request: what (GLAM) metadata should be stored where?
Message-ID: <8e3e4b3a-93db-6ed2-2b0c-a39c8b14f49a(a)wikimedia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Hi everyone!
Just a quick reminder before the weekend: this consultation on Commons
closes next Thursday, March 1, already.
Your feedback about GLAM metadata is vital here; we really want to make
sure that GLAM-specific data is taken well into account in the big sweep
of changes that will be implemented on Wikimedia Commons in the upcoming
year :-)
So, if you have been involved in GLAM uploads to Commons in the past
years, and/or if you edit or use GLAM files: please take a look and
comment!
The discussion has now moved to the talk page, so this is the place to be:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Structured_
data/Get_involved/Feedback_requests/Ontology#Discussion_
for_metadata_that_is_specific_or_important_for_GLAMs
Thank you :-) Sandra
On 16/02/2018 11:39, Sandra Fauconnier wrote:
Hi everyone,
There is a new feedback request up on Wikimedia Commons, regarding
Structured Data on Commons. The topic is a very important discussion:
between wikitext-in-Mediawiki, Wikibase on Commons, and Wikibase on
Wikidata, what file metadata gets store where?
I would like to invite everyone involved in GLAM projects on Commons
to help us think about file metadata that is especially important for,
and sometimes unique to, media files that have been provided/uploaded
by GLAM institutions.
Feedback on GLAM metadata is collected here on the page:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/
Get_involved/Feedback_requests/Ontology#Discussion_
for_metadata_that_is_specific_or_important_for_GLAMs
This consultation will formally run for two weeks, closing on 1 March.
There will not be decisions made at that time; this is a part of the
information-gathering process in order to make the informed decisions.
Thank you for your time, see you on the wiki!
Sandra
--
Sandra Fauconnier
GLAM-Wiki Strategist, Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter: @glamwiki
How Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums work with Wikimedia
communities:https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM
--
Sandra Fauconnier
GLAM-Wiki Strategist, Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter: @glamwiki
How Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums work with Wikimedia
communities:
https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM