> I think a separate libraries list is important; I've asked librarians
> in Australian partner institutions if they want to join the
> cultural-partners mailing list, and they arnt interested because its
> too broad, and doesnt focus on issues that libraries are grappling
> with.
> I wasnt aware of the separate libraries list until phoebe's email.
> renaming it to open-access would be a good approach to keep a list
> that is more focused on issues librarians face. open access
> initiatives are very important to libraries at the moment.
I'd be disappointed if this "Wikimedia & Libraries" list was renamed "Open Access." While OA is certainly a valid topic, I suspect it is not the primary concern of all librarians who would be interested in being involved with WP.
The only way I found out about the Wikimedia & Libraries list was because I joined cultural-partners and went to the root directory to see what other lists are on the server. Whoever is the listowner: if you want to have an active list, you need to have appropriate publicity (not just a one time blast, whenever that was).
ALA and IFLA are this summer; it's a pity an effort wasn't made to have more of a WP presence at ALA (I don't attend IFLA). Nevertheless there are venues where I (and hopefully others) can publicize activity in anticipation of Wikipedia Loves Libraries this fall.