In an academic context, quaternary sources, those citing Wikipedia, itself
a tertiary source, anonymously and with various degrees of accuracy and
verifiability citing arbitrary secondary sources, themselves presumed to
be authoritatively based on primary sources, are about as trustworthy as
our President or Prime Minister.
I have no faith. I read (and add) references, not articles.
Math and computer science are
exemplar exceptions; the humanities and the social sciences are
comparatively hopeless for anything other than source discovery.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, 2:45 PM Kathleen DeLaurenti <
kathleendelaurenti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Andy. Doing to many things at once.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, 3:33 PM Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>
wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 20:13, Kathleen
DeLaurenti
<kathleendelaurenti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Andy. But I think Merilee appropriately
clarified that the
policy is about
internal citations - not suggesting that other
publications cannot cite
or should not
cite Wikipedia.
Not the same page. Please see the one I referred to (and whose URL I
quote above).
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries