No one ever commented again on this, leaving one member supporting (Michael) and one opposing (Gerard). I want to close this somehow. Remember that the test project itself is small, and nowhere close to approval. Based on policy, I think that we should mark this eligible--since the language is eligible--and add a comment (on the request page) that the project will not likely be approved until/unless it is converted to Perso-Arabic script, at least at parity to Latin script. I don't actually think that there are policy grounds to reject this, since the language is eligible. The alternative approach, to me, is to mark this as "on hold, pending a community working to convert this to Perso-Arabic script", and then rejecting as stale if that doesn't happen in a year. Thoughts? Steven Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom