Langcom-l is old, langcom@ is new.
Am 27.04.2015 05:42 schrieb "Oliver Stegen" <oliver_stegen(a)sil.org>rg>:
***Looks like I should have sent this to LangCom-L
straight away rather
than to LangCom only, right? Which is the old, and which is the new?***
Re new members: How am I supposed to gauge whether a newly proposed
LangCom member is proactive enough to pass muster?
In more general terms: Do we need a discussion on this list about our
I've just seen that there was a discussion about LangCom on Meta about a
month ago (
Fine, so I'm considered active - but I'm only really active on this
mailing list (and on sw:wp and by extension on wikidata but that's a
different matter). If someone contacts me on a talk page, chances are that
I won't respond. And I also don't feel comfortable engaging in discussions
outside of this mailing list.
SO: Is it sufficient for me to react to posts on this mailing list which
concern my agreement or disagreement with regard to a new language project?
Or do you, my fellow LangCom members, prefer for me to resign if I don't
feel able to be more proactive than that?
On 16-Apr-15 9:22 AM, Santhosh Thottingal wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Request for Membership
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 06:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali <rachitrali(a)yahoo.com> <rachitrali(a)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Rehmat Aziz Chitrali <rachitrali(a)yahoo.com>
To: langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org <langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
I am Test Wiki Administrator at Wiki Incubator projects Pakistan. I want
to become member of Language Committee from Pakistan.
Rehmat Aziz Chitrali,Gold Medalist
Linguist & Culture Researcher
Langcom-l mailing list