I was planning to write this mail some time in the future, but since now two users requested to become a member, I'm doing it now: When discussing about membership requests, there might sometimes be reasons for a non-public discussion. Maybe we could reactive the old non-public langcom-l for that purpose?
I agree. Let's do the following:
* Remove everybody who is not a LangCom member from that list. (OK, Asaf should be welcome there as our de facto acting WMF liaison; we need to talk about liaison, as well; I am writing my notes from the Berlin meeting.) * Add there all the LangCom members. * Change the prefix from "[Langcom]" to something like "[Private Langcom]". * Then, whenever we want to discuss there, we should first call for that here (like you did) and we should report here the conclusion. I am sure we'll use it just when we have to talk about particular persons.
Also, who is admin there?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I was planning to write this mail some time in the future, but since now two users requested to become a member, I'm doing it now: When discussing about membership requests, there might sometimes be reasons for a non-public discussion. Maybe we could reactive the old non-public langcom-l for that purpose?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
2017-04-13 0:02 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
I agree. Let's do the following:
- Remove everybody who is not a LangCom member from that list. (OK,
Asaf should be welcome there as our de facto acting WMF liaison; we need to talk about liaison, as well; I am writing my notes from the Berlin meeting.)
- Add there all the LangCom members.
- Change the prefix from "[Langcom]" to something like "[Private Langcom]".
- Then, whenever we want to discuss there, we should first call for
that here (like you did) and we should report here the conclusion. I am sure we'll use it just when we have to talk about particular persons.
Also, who is admin there?
Langcom-l https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l list run by jhsoby at gmail.com, robinp.1273 at gmail.com, santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com langcom-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I was planning to write this mail some time in the future, but since now
two
users requested to become a member, I'm doing it now: When discussing about membership requests, there might sometimes be
reasons
for a non-public discussion. Maybe we could reactive the old non-public langcom-l for that purpose?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
So, first, Jon, Robin, Santhosh, may you normalize list admins per the public list?
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:06 AM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
2017-04-13 0:02 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
I agree. Let's do the following:
- Remove everybody who is not a LangCom member from that list. (OK,
Asaf should be welcome there as our de facto acting WMF liaison; we need to talk about liaison, as well; I am writing my notes from the Berlin meeting.)
- Add there all the LangCom members.
- Change the prefix from "[Langcom]" to something like "[Private
Langcom]".
- Then, whenever we want to discuss there, we should first call for
that here (like you did) and we should report here the conclusion. I am sure we'll use it just when we have to talk about particular persons.
Also, who is admin there?
Langcom-l list run by jhsoby at gmail.com, robinp.1273 at gmail.com, santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I was planning to write this mail some time in the future, but since now two users requested to become a member, I'm doing it now: When discussing about membership requests, there might sometimes be reasons for a non-public discussion. Maybe we could reactive the old non-public langcom-l for that purpose?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I have now updated the admin list to be the same as the admins for this list (admins take note!), changed the list prefix to "[Private Langcom]", unsubscribed people that I'm sure are not members, and made it so that emails from anyone but members are automatically discarded. This last part is to ensure that we admins don't get so much spam to deal with.
Only step remaining is to make sure the subscribers' email addresses are up-to-date and current. I believe the members of the list are only the current langcom members, but I'm not sure whether all the e-mail addresses are current. I'll post the full list of subscribers to the private list so everyone can check to see if there are errors.
2017-04-13 0:14 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
So, first, Jon, Robin, Santhosh, may you normalize list admins per the public list?
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:06 AM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
2017-04-13 0:02 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
I agree. Let's do the following:
- Remove everybody who is not a LangCom member from that list. (OK,
Asaf should be welcome there as our de facto acting WMF liaison; we need to talk about liaison, as well; I am writing my notes from the Berlin meeting.)
- Add there all the LangCom members.
- Change the prefix from "[Langcom]" to something like "[Private
Langcom]".
- Then, whenever we want to discuss there, we should first call for
that here (like you did) and we should report here the conclusion. I am sure we'll use it just when we have to talk about particular persons.
Also, who is admin there?
Langcom-l list run by jhsoby at gmail.com, robinp.1273 at gmail.com, santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I was planning to write this mail some time in the future, but since
now
two users requested to become a member, I'm doing it now: When discussing about membership requests, there might sometimes be reasons for a non-public discussion. Maybe we could reactive the old non-public langcom-l for that purpose?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Thanks, Jon!
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com wrote:
I have now updated the admin list to be the same as the admins for this list (admins take note!), changed the list prefix to "[Private Langcom]", unsubscribed people that I'm sure are not members, and made it so that emails from anyone but members are automatically discarded. This last part is to ensure that we admins don't get so much spam to deal with.
Only step remaining is to make sure the subscribers' email addresses are up-to-date and current. I believe the members of the list are only the current langcom members, but I'm not sure whether all the e-mail addresses are current. I'll post the full list of subscribers to the private list so everyone can check to see if there are errors.
2017-04-13 0:14 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
So, first, Jon, Robin, Santhosh, may you normalize list admins per the public list?
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:06 AM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
2017-04-13 0:02 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
I agree. Let's do the following:
- Remove everybody who is not a LangCom member from that list. (OK,
Asaf should be welcome there as our de facto acting WMF liaison; we need to talk about liaison, as well; I am writing my notes from the Berlin meeting.)
- Add there all the LangCom members.
- Change the prefix from "[Langcom]" to something like "[Private
Langcom]".
- Then, whenever we want to discuss there, we should first call for
that here (like you did) and we should report here the conclusion. I am sure we'll use it just when we have to talk about particular persons.
Also, who is admin there?
Langcom-l list run by jhsoby at gmail.com, robinp.1273 at gmail.com, santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
I was planning to write this mail some time in the future, but since now two users requested to become a member, I'm doing it now: When discussing about membership requests, there might sometimes be reasons for a non-public discussion. Maybe we could reactive the old non-public langcom-l for that purpose?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom