On 31 Dec 2017, at 17:16, Steven White
<Koala19890(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Well, there was a discussion starting about December 3, 2016 that MF-Warburg started.
Milos and Gerard responded favorably (providing language check was positive). Amir was
concerned the test might have been too stubby. There were no other comments, and there’s
been nothing since (except for discussion about the lack of response of a language
expert).
The test has been running on Incubator for nearly 11 years. It’s probably still a little
on the stubby side, in my view. But it’s remained active all year while awaiting “language
confirmation”, all the interface translation is done, and it’s got a lot of pages. And
they’ve clearly cleaned up the quality of the language. So here’s my suggestion:
• Let’s open a new discussion week here, just for transparency.
• I’d suggest (but of course can’t demand) not letting “stubbiness” get in the way at
this point. When I inform them of approval, I’ll certainly strongly encourage them to
build up the pages they already have going forward. The community has been active, and its
members have been really patient in continuing to work on for all these years. I think
they deserve our recognition and support at this point.
Steven
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom