Thanks for your message, I have seen the mail from August and I think we have already given the rationale within this update. As a language oriented project (all the wikisources are), we want to give full support to our language. That's why we were: - continuously working in localisation (this month a bit faster): - In eleven years of other foo.source projects nobody else than the nap.source backers took care of localisation for this language; - providing support in our language: - I don't think I can change it.source + templates + documentation, to my language, and I am not interested in producing faulty documentation in italian. I imagine the italian community is not interested in somebody writing their templates and docs in neapolitan or in faulty italian. - I don't think it.source agrees to have 24h-365d contents fully in neapolitan in their main page and community. Other languages of Italy (vec, ca, la, de, el) were not excluded from the process. - If somebody of our visitors/contributors does not speak italian he or she will be excluded - It leaves open path for cross-source-translations (future) - - Still we need a common.css/js different for our locale - Effective working in neapolitan language, in contraposition to the ''collect-everything'' approach of it.source: - In 11 years of it.wikisource this is the result: https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/?title=Testi_in_napoletano&c… - I know there is a bit more, but nobody took care of classificating it properly. I don't think this can be achieved in any other foo.source projects alone, so the need is there. If we add the reason given by Gerard: neapolitan-language speakers are not second class citizens, and so: We have preferred to work under the mul.wikisource umbrella until we are ready for the jump, just to make the things right. Best regards, and thanks for including me, C.R. 2015-09-11 4:10 GMT+02:00 MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>om>: