gt;.
I believe there are several requests open for related languages. It would
be good to have some clarity to avoid the community being split into
multiple incubator test-wikis.
Am Fr., 18. Aug. 2023 um 14:38 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki <
sotiale.wm(a)gmail.com>gt;:
Thank you for your kind explanation.
If this can be understood as the relationship between Standard Arabic
(ISO 639:arb) and Arabic (ISO 639:ara), then zgh is not a distinct language
because it is just a standard representation of Berber languages. This is
true even in light of the current LPP, which excludes different written
forms of any language.
Therefore, it seems that eligibility for this language cannot be
recognized.
Sotiale
2023년 8월 16일 (수) 오후 10:48, Anass Sedrati <sedranas(a)gmail.xn--com>-4f21ay07k 작성:
> Hello,
>
> I am very familiar with this case as I come myself from Morocco and
> speak Berber. The standard Tamazight (
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Moroccan_Amazigh) is not a
> spoken language, but only a written one. It was created by the official
> Academy of Berber languages in Morocco (
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Institute_of_Amazigh_Culture) in
> an attempt to standardize the Berber languages, as there are many of them
> spoken in Morocco (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_languages).
>
> So to answer you, standard Tamazight is exactly like modern standard
> Arabic (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Standard_Arabic). It is
> a standardized language with rules, but not a spoken one (nobody speaks
> standard Arabic as a mother tongue, every Arab country has its own dialect).
>
> This is to explain that even if it not native, Zgh can be treated as
> modern standard Arabic in terms of linguistics. I hope that this gives a
> bit of context, but I am happy to expand on any aspect if you have
> additional questions!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Anass
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:00 PM Sotiale Wiki <sotiale.wm(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the Moroccan languages, so I'd love to hear
>> from other colleagues.
>>
>> I'm considering this language project as a potential candidate for
>> approval, but I'm wondering if this is a standardization of other
>> languages, or a distinct language from others?
>>
>> Since this site[1] states that there are no native speakers, I
>> wondered if this was just standardization of other languages(the case that
>> native speakers have a standardized language while using their own
>> languages).
>>
>> [1]
https://www.ethnologue.com/language/zgh/
>>
>> Sotiale
>>
>>
>>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
바이러스가
>>
없습니다.www.avast.com
>>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
<#m_-4434755659234619680_m_3445872535440906073_m_5983961874573513948_m_-52777032840040729_m_-1496450384923849562_m_5794971244151197459_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> *Anass SEDRATI*
> *(+46) 70 508 51 07*
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org