Hi Antony,The reason we should not reject this proposal is the same reason we have two Wikipedias for Punjabi.There is no major linguistic difference but complete linguistic coversion is not possible. Also, we will have to consider one script superior to other.RegardsSatdeep GillStrategy Coordinator, Wikimedia FoundationCo-founder, Punjabi Wikimedians
Treasurer, Affiliations CommitteeMember, Language CommitteeThere is a request for Sindi in Devanagari [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/
A user has pointed out [meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.Requests_for_new_languages/ ]. As far as anyone can tell, there is no linguistic difference between this and Arabic-script Sindhi, which already has a Wikipedia at sd.wikipedia.org.Wikipedia_Sindhi
php?title=Requests_for_new_ ] that online conversion between the two scripts should be possible (neither script uses capital letters), so is there any reason we shouldn't just reject this proposal?languages/Wikipedia_Sindhi& diff=16501764&oldid=16478916
Regards,
Antony
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom