Revived Cornish has had a century of publication. I in fact have published well over two
million words in Cornish. I’ve never looked into Revived Prussian, but it should be easy
to determine whether it’s robust enough for use.
On 16 Jul 2018, at 19:39, Jan van Steenbergen
<ijzeren.jan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On the other hand,, the Langcom accepted Lingua Franca Nova, which has no native speakers
either. Yet, the project is doing very well: almost 1,400 new articles since it was
created, less than three months ago.
Of course, Modern Prussian is a semi-constructed language. But then, the same goes for
Cornish. Who are we to decide whether a language is viable or not? Personally, I'd
mark it eligible. If they can make the test wiki work (I mean: really really work), then I
see no counter-indication for a Prussian Wikipedia either.
For the record, I've never understood why there cannot be a Wikipedia in Ancient
Greek, since there are millions of people worldwide who can write in it.
Best regards,
Jan van Steenbergen