On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:

I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can be approved. Did anyone check it already?

No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that inside of the first email.

On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language preservation.

Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your opinion?