I support both these proposals and would remind everyone that English Wikisource also hosts Old English texts, so there is no need for a separate ang-wikisource.
Antony
On 07.10.2014 02:41, MF-Warburg wrote:
=> I propose: Close, move content to Incubator, or, where appropriate, to Wikisoure.Wikisource is the project that should exist for this language.- Wikibooks is for textbooks and manuals, but nobody is writing them in this extinct language nor is there much reason why someone would want to /read/ them.To summarize:Reasons are outlined on the page; the majority of users agrees.Hi all,we have several closure proposals which should be decided... Here are the first two:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Old_English_Wikibooks_2
In fact, some pages on the wiki do belong to Wikisource, and should be moved there. This is also consistent with Langcom's previous decisions that ancient languages should above all have Wikisource, but the other projects are not all suitable for them.
----
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Interlingue_Wikibooks
The wiki is a case of "absence of content since its creation". Of the few page, some should even be moved to Wiktionary (as some people noted in the discussion).
=> I propose: Close, move content to Incubator, or, where appropriate, to Wiktionary.
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97 Mobile: +49 (0)163 370 08 27 E-mail: toniogreen@web.de
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom