I agree with approval as well.
While activity on TWN only seems to have restarted 3 days ago, I'm fine
with it as the most-used messages are already translated and it seems like
the contributions to shn.wp and wt/shn are at least not heavily impeded by
missing interface translations.
Am Di., 24. März 2020 um 13:35 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il>gt;:
Both parts of your objection go against current
written policy, Gerard.
If you want to start rejecting all Wiktionary projects because you don't
like it and because Wikidata is better (at least according to you), this
must be discussed separately.
And the policy about localization is: "If a Wikimedia project in your
language already exists and these messages have already been translated, we
ask that you show evidence that localisation is continuing to be improved
and maintained at a reasonable pace." There is activity in Shan in
translatewiki, so this is not a problem.
As for myself, I checked the activity and the quality of the pages and
both look fine. I support the approval of this.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
בתאריך יום ג׳, 24 במרץ 2020 ב-12:38 מאת Gerard Meijssen <
gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi,
You may know that I have a history with Wiktionary .. Given that Wikidata
is superior in supporting lexical content, I am wary to approve. That and I
do care about localisation.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 07:27, Kimberli Mäkäräinen <
kimberli.makarainen(a)tuni.fi> wrote:
Activity is fine. I won't hold the
localization level against them, so I
think it should be approved.
-K
------------------------------
*From:* Langcom <langcom-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Jon
Harald Søby <jhsoby(a)gmail.com>
*Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2020 2:29 PM
*To:* Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee <
langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Langcom] Request Approval of Shan Wiktionary (wt/shn)
I am satisfied with the activity here, so I would be happy to approve.
The only thing which could need some improvement is the localization on
Translatewiki, Shan is currently at 57 % translated
<https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Special:MessageGroupStats?group=core&suppressempty=1&x=D>
for MediaWiki core. But I don't want to hold that against them, but just
encourage a bit more translation there.
fre. 20. mar. 2020 kl. 20:13 skrev Kyi Phyo Htet <
leonhart.njs(a)googlemail.com>gt;:
Dear respectful LangCom Members,
The Shan Wiktionary project is active enough[1] and has more than 9500
entries.[2] The Shan community's first Wikipedia Project (Shan Wikipedia)
was approved and created on 2018.[3] Please review their second project[4]
for the final approval. Thanks.
[1]
https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=wt/shn…
[2]
https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wt/shn/%E1%81%BC%E1%82%83%E1%82%88%E1%…
[3]
https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Incubator:News#2018
[4]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Shan
On behalf of Shan Wiki Community,
Kyi Phyo Htet / User:Ninjastrikers
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ninjastrikers>
Myanmar Wikimedia Community User Group
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Myanmar_Wikimedia_Community_User_Group>
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
mvh
Jon Harald Søby
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom