I see no opposition by the native speakers neither here [1] or here
[2]. Actually, one admin of mo.wp strongly supported it [1][3].
[1]
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
mo is a catch all and includes all the ISO-639-3 codes. Our policy has been
that the community may decide on this.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 16 January 2016 at 18:36, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why have a Wikipedia where the only difference is
a different script? So
far
we did not accept that.
If you want a formal requirement, present Mongolian Wikipedia is using
"mo" as ISO 639-1 substitute for "khk", while they are asking for
"mvf".
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom