So ignore me. But verification is part of the
game.You do not threaten
us and cowe us in undesired consequences. It is not for you to make these
threats.
GerardM
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 23:35, Steven White <Koala19890(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
Now that things are starting to move again, I
intend to approve four
projects: Guiane Creole WP, Saraiki WP, Mon WP and Tacawit (Shawiya)
Wiktionary. No, none of these has been verified. But this is not the fault
of the people who created the projects, this is the fault of the Language
Committee, which did not do its job. Accordingly, I will approve and send
to phabricator for creation all four of these projects by 17:00 UTC on
Monday, 19 August. I will not do that in a particular case only if ALL of
the following happens:
- Someone objects in a particular case that they have reason to be
concerned about the validity of the language.
- That person also specifically commits to contacting an expert
immediately.
- Then, within 48 hours, that person has contacted the expert, and
identified the expert to the mail list.
- Then, the expert has 7 days to respond.
Otherwise, I need to fall back on "Assume Good Faith". And look, if one
of these turns out to be another Siberian, we'll be embarrassed, and we'll
delete the project. But I've been watching all of these projects for the
last two years, and I don't have any reason to believe there is a problem.
If anyone tries to object in any way other than the specific way I have
outlined above, I intend to ignore that person. Sorry, but at this point,
the Committee only has the right to intervene if it intends to become
active again and do its job.
Steven
Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org